ArticleJournal of food science2025
Enhancing beer authentication, quality, and control assessment using non-invasive spectroscopy through bottle and machine learning modeling.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Cutting-Edge Technologies in Food Sensory and Consumer Science: Applications and Future Directions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics for Liquor Product Quality Assessment: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Electroanalytical Approaches to Combatting Food Adulteration: Advances in Non-Enzymatic Techniques for Ensuring Quality and Authenticity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing beer authentication, quality, and control assessment using non-invasive spectroscopy through bottle and machine learning modeling.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fraud in alcoholic beverages through counterfeiting and adulteration is rising, significantly impacting companies economically. This study aimed to develop a method using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy (1596-2396 nm) through the bottle, along with machine learning (ML) modeling for beer authentication, quality traits, and control assessment. For this study, 25 commercial beers from different brands, styles, and three types of fermentation were used. To obtain the ground-truth data, a quantitative descriptive analysis was conducted with 11 trained panelists to evaluate the intensity of 16 sensory descriptors, and volatile aromatic compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). The ML models were developed using artificial neural networks with NIR absorbance values as inputs to predict (i) type of fermentation (Model 1), (ii) intensity of 16 sensory descriptors (Model 2), and (iii) peak area of volatile aromatic compounds (Model 3). All models resulted in high overall accuracy (Model 1: 99%; Model 2: R = 0.92; Model 3: R = 0.94), and model deployment for new beer samples showed high performance (Model 1: 95%; Model 2: R = 0.83). This method enables brewers and retailers to analyze beers without opening bottles, preventing quality assurance issues, fraud, and provenance concerns. Further model training with new targets could assess additional quality traits like physicochemical parameters and origin. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Near-infrared spectroscopy coupled with ML modeling is a novel method for assessing beer quality and authentication through the bottle. It serves as a rapid, accurate tool for predicting sensory and aroma profiles without opening the bottle. Additionally, it monitors quality traits during transport and storage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.