ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Reflections of Foster Youth Engaging in the Co-Design of Digital Mental Health Technology: Duoethnography Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation and effectiveness of the web‑based skills training START NOW in adolescents in residential youth care: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
- Trauma-informed conversational agents for mental health: understanding user perspectives and experiences.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Lessons Learned from Co-Designing a Digital Health App for Foster Youth: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Advancing access to substance use prevention for foster youth through digital innovation: an open trial of fostrspace with court appointed special advocate programs.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent research on digital applications to support the mental health and well-being of foster youth is limited to theoretical applications for transition-aged foster youth and support platforms developed without intentional input from foster youth themselves. Centering the lived expertise of foster youth in digital solutions is crucial to dismantling barriers to care, leading to an increase in service access and improving mental health outcomes. Co-design centers the intended end users during the design process, creating a direct relationship between potential users and developers. This methodology holds promise for creating tools centered on foster youth, yet little is known about the co-design experience for foster youth. Understanding foster youth's experience with co-design is crucial to identifying best practices, knowledge of which is currently limited.
objectiveThe aim of this paper is to reflect on the experiences of 4 foster youth involved in the co-design of FostrSpace, a mobile app designed through a collaboration among foster youth in the San Francisco Bay Area; clinicians and academics from the Juvenile Justice Behavioral Health research team at the University of California, San Francisco; and Chorus Innovations, a rapid technology development platform specializing in participatory design practices. Key recommendations for co-designing with foster youth were generated with reference to these reflections.
methodsA duoethnography study was conducted over a 1-month period with the 4 transition-aged former foster youth co-designers of FostrSpace via written reflections and a single in-person roundtable discussion. Reflections were coded and analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsIn total, 4 main themes were identified from coding of the duoethnography reflections: power and control, resource navigation, building community and safe spaces, and identity. Themes of power and control and resource navigation highlighted the challenges FostrSpace co-designers experienced trying to access basic needs, support from caregivers, and mental health resources as foster youth and former foster youth. Discussions pertaining to building community and safe spaces highlighted the positive effect of foster youth communities on co-designers, and discussions related to identity revealed the complexities associated with understanding and embracing foster youth identity.
conclusionsThis duoethnography study highlights the importance of centering the lived expertise of co-designers throughout the app development process. As the digital health field increasingly shifts toward using co-design methods to develop digital mental health technologies for underserved youth populations, we offer recommendations for researchers seeking to ethically and effectively engage youth co-designers. Actively reflecting throughout the co-design process, finding creative ways to engage in power-sharing practices to build community, and ensuring mutual benefit among co-designers are some of the recommended core components to address when co-designing behavioral health technologies for youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.