Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39832130›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Machine learning models for predicting postoperative peritoneal metastasis after hepatocellular carcinoma rupture: a multicenter cohort study in China.

Feng Xia, Qian Chen, Zhicheng Liu, Qiao Zhang, Bin Guo, Feimu Fan, Zhiyuan Huang, Jun Zheng, Hengyi Gao, Guobing Xia and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Feng XiaDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8826-6310
Qian ChenDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Zhicheng LiuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Qiao ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Zhongshan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Bin GuoDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Feimu FanDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyuan HuangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhengDepartment of Science and Education, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hengyi GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen Longhua District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Guobing XiaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Huangshi Central Hospital, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Li RenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.
Hongliang MeiDepartment of General Surgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoping ChenDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Qi ChengDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Bixiang ZhangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Peng ZhuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-0615

Funding

General Project of Health Commission of Hubei Province WJ2021M108Hengrui Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignant Tumor Research Fund-Youth Research Fund CXPJJH11800001-2018306Key project of science and technology in Hubei Province 2018ACA137Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2019CFB433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal metastasis (PM) after the rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a critical issue that negatively affects patient prognosis. Machine learning models have shown great potential in predicting clinical outcomes; however, the optimal model for this specific problem remains unclear.

methodsClinical data were collected and analyzed from 522 patients with ruptured HCC who underwent surgery at 7 different medical centers. Patients were assigned to the training, validation, and test groups in a random manner, with a distribution ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. Overall, 78 (14.9%) patients experienced postoperative PM. Five different types of models, including logistic regression, support vector machines, classification trees, random forests, and deep learning (DL) models, were trained using these data and evaluated based on their receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) values and F1 scores.

resultsThe DL models achieved the highest AUC values (10-fold training cohort: 0.943, validation set: 0.928, and test set: 0.892) and F1 scores (10-fold training set: 0.917, validation cohort: 0.908, and test set:0.899) The results of the analysis indicate that tumor size, timing of hepatectomy, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and microvascular invasion are the most important predictive factors closely associated with the incidence of postoperative PM.

conclusionThe DL model outperformed all other machine learning models in predicting postoperative PM after the rupture of HCC based on clinical data. This model provides valuable information for clinicians to formulate individualized treatment plans that can improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosismachine learningmetastasisperitoneumprognostic factorsrupture hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39832130
PMCPMC11745018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.