Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39832124›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2025

Sustainability of Enzymatic Monomer Synthesis: Evaluation via Comparison of Petrochemical and Enzymatic Alkene Epoxidation by Life Cycle Assessment.

Robin Tannert, Sarah Barth, Jakob Hildebrandt, Andreas Taubert, Jens Weber

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robin TannertZIRKON, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz (University of Applied Sciences), Theodor-Körner-Allee 16, 02763, Zittau, Germany.
Sarah BarthFaculty of Natural and Environmental Science, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz (University of Applied Sciences), Theodor-Körner-Allee 16, 02763, Zittau, Germany.
Jakob HildebrandtZIRKON, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz (University of Applied Sciences), Theodor-Körner-Allee 16, 02763, Zittau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3018-4798
Andreas TaubertInstitute of Chemistry, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9329-0072
Jens WeberZIRKON, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz (University of Applied Sciences), Theodor-Körner-Allee 16, 02763, Zittau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-5065

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13FH2I06IABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13IHS214EUniversität Potsdam 53170000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used, next to green chemistry concepts, to compare the full environmental impacts of the epoxidation of a bio-based monomer, which can be used for the synthesis of vitrimers. On a laboratory scale, the synthesis of the monomer can either be done via a petrochemical route or via an enzymatic reaction pathway. Both reaction pathways were initially optimized to minimize the impact of suboptimal routes on the sustainability evaluation. The subsequent assessment of the enzymatic routes shows lower impact factors for most criteria compared to the petrochemical routes. A significant drawback of the enzymatic reaction, however, is its electricity consumption. The yields of the respective reactions also proved to be crucial; realistic changes in yields revealed the petrochemical reaction to be more sustainable in some cases. LCA is therefore a valuable tool for the preliminary evaluation of the developed synthesis pathways and to identify the critical adjustments needed to increase the sustainability of each reaction.

Indexed as

AlkenesEpoxy CompoundsBiocatalysisGreen Chemistry TechnologyAlkenesEpoxy CompoundsCAL-BCatalysisEpoxidationLife cycle assessmentSustainable chemistry

Identifiers

PMID39832124
PMCPMC12094135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.