ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
On the Effect of the Patient Table on Attenuation in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging SPECT.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe topic of the effect of the patient table on attenuation in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) SPECT is gaining new relevance due to deep learning methods. Existing studies on this effect are old, rare and only consider phantom measurements, not patient studies. This study investigates the effect of the patient table on attenuation based on the difference between reconstructions of phantom scans and polar maps of patient studies.
methodsJaszczak phantom scans are acquired according to quality control and MPI procedures. An algorithm is developed to automatically remove the patient table from the CT for attenuation correction. The scans are then reconstructed with attenuation correction either with or without the patient table in the CT. The reconstructions are compared qualitatively and on the basis of their percentage difference. In addition, a small retrospective cohort of 15 patients is examined by comparing the resulting polar maps. Polar maps are compared qualitatively and based on the segment perfusion scores.
resultsThe phantom reconstructions look qualitatively similar in both the quality control and MPI procedures. The percentage difference is highest in the lower part of the phantom, but it always remains below 17.5%. Polar maps from patient studies also look qualitatively similar. Furthermore, the segment scores are not significantly different (p=0.83).
conclusionsThe effect of the patient table on attenuation in MPI SPECT is negligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.