ReviewBiodegradation2025
Advances in waste-derived functional materials for PFAS remediation.
Review in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic organofluoride compounds, widely used in industries since the 1950s for their hydrophobic properties. PFAS contamination of soil and water poses significant environmental and public health risks due to their persistence, chemical stability, and resistance to degradation. The Chemical Abstracts Service catalogs approximately 4300 PFAS globally. Research in various regions such as North America, Asia, Europe, and remote polar zones has revealed the accumulation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the tissues of various animal species, with concentrations reaching up to 1900 ng/g in aquatic species like dolphins and whales. Researchers have employed various remediation techniques such as solvent extraction, ion exchange, precipitation, adsorption, and membrane filtration, each of which has its drawbacks. Adsorption, particularly using waste-derived functional materials like biochar, is emerging as a promising method for PFAS remediation due to its cost-effectiveness and sustainability. For example, waste timber-derived biochar exhibits adsorption efficiency comparable to commercial activated carbon. This review highlights advancements in using agricultural, industrial, and biological waste-derived materials for sustainable PFAS remediation. We discuss innovative modification techniques like hydrothermal synthesis, pyrolysis, calcination, co-precipitation, the sol-gel method, and ball milling. The study also examines adsorption mechanisms, factors affecting adsorption efficiency, and the technological challenges in scaling up waste-derived material use. It aims to explore developments, challenges, and future directions for using these materials for efficient PFAS remediation and contributing to sustainable environmental cleanup solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39832063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.