ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Displaced cortical vein sign on CT in infants: a reliable predictor to distinguish low-attenuation subdural collections from benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiating benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces (BESS) from low-attenuation subdural collections on CT imaging of infants can be challenging. This distinction is crucial in infants, as subdural collections may raise the concern for abusive head trauma (AHT). To evaluate the utilization of the displaced cortical vein sign on CT as a predictor of pathological subdural collections confirmed by MRI and to assess the reproducibility of this finding among radiologists with different levels of clinical experience. A total of 104 imaging exams were independently reviewed by junior- and senior-level radiologists (52 head CTs and 52 corresponding brain MRI exams). These exams included 43 MRI-confirmed cases of subdural collections and 9 MRI-confirmed cases of BESS from patients aged 0-2 years. The presence of pathological collections and sulcal flattening, and the displaced cortical vein sign were recorded for both reviewers along with attenuation and signal characteristics of the collections. Confirmed diagnosis of AHT was determined by chart review. The sensitivity, specificity, and inter-observer reliability were analyzed between reviewers. The average patient age was 6.4 months with a median age of 4 months. The sensitivity values of the displaced cortical vein sign on CT for the presence of subdural collections were 69.6% and 79.0% for the two reviewers, respectively. The specificity of this finding was 100% for both reviewers, with no false negative cases. Interobserver reliability was the highest for the depiction of the displaced cortical vein sign on CT (κ=0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.82) and MRI (κ=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.00). All cases where at least 1 reviewer noted the displaced cortical vein sign on CT and were later confirmed to be traumatic subdural collection on MRI were concluded to have high concern for AHT upon chart review. In total, 23.3% (11 out of 52) of cases confirmed to have subdural collections on MRI were found to have calvarial fractures associated with their presentation. The displaced cortical vein sign on head CT is a specific and reproducible finding associated with subdural collections. Our data suggest that this sign is a more reliable and readily identifiable indicator of pathological subdural collections compared to other traditional imaging findings, such as flattening of the cerebral sulci.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39831978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.