ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Assessment of viable tumours by [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of liver fibrosis and tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- Comparison of lesion detection rates between FAPI PET/CT andJapanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET: A Scoping Review of Emerging Oncologic and Fibroinflammatory Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The predictive value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- The diagnostic value of 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a head-to-head comparison with 18 F-FDG PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the efficacy of [
methodsA cohort of 37 LRT patients with HCC (encompassing 51 lesions) was retrospectively included from a prospective parent study (ChiCTR2000039099), and sequential PET/CT using [
resultsBoth the sensitivity (96.0% [24/25] vs. 36.0% [9/25], p < 0.001) and accuracy (94.1%, [48/51] vs. 68.6% [35/51], p = 0.004) of [
conclusion[
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000039099. Registered 17 October 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39831967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.