ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Spinal cord injury in abusive and accidental head injury in children, a neuropathological investigation.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AbHT) in children is a challenging one that needs to be differentiated from natural disease and accidental head injury (AcHT). There is increasing evidence from the Neuroradiology field showing spinal cord injury in children subject to AbHT, which has, so far, been poorly investigated pathologically. In this study we retrospectively reviewed the forensic records of 110 paediatric head injury cases over an eight-year-period. The records included detailed circumstances of death and clinical history alongside neuropathology, ophthalmic pathology and osteo-articular pathology. Based on the final multidisciplinary agreement, the 110 case were grouped into AbHT (n = 40), AcHT (n = 9), not clearly accidental or abusive ("undetermined" (UHT) n = 8) and non-traumatic brain injury (NTBI, n = 53). The spinal cord pathology present within each group was compared. Spinal subdural haematoma (SDH) was present in 71% of AbHT and 50% of AcHT cases and were located predominantly at the thoracolumbar level. In AbHT cases without spinal SDH, the suspected mechanism of injury was that of head impact rather than shaking, whilst cases of AcHT with spinal SDH were associated with direct trauma to the spinal cord. Injury of spinal nerve roots in AbHT was almost three times that seen in the accidental head injury group (58% vs. 17%). The study shows that pathological examination of the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots is of high value in investigating AHT and may help in differentiating AbHT from AcHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.