ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Blood Pressure Control and Incident Left-Ventricular Conduction Disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empiric pacing in unexplained syncope and bifascicular block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiac conduction disease, a harbinger of pacemaker implantation, heart failure, and death, is commonly regarded as immutable. However, emerging research suggests it may be a target for upstream prevention strategies such as blood pressure management. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding blood pressure control and the development of conduction disease. RECENT
findingsRecent observational studies link hypertension to both prevalent and incident conduction disease. In randomized trials, intensive blood pressure control among hypertensive individuals reduced the incidence of left-ventricular conduction abnormalities in the form of fascicular- and left bundle branch blocks, while treatment with lisinopril independent of blood pressure control appeared to reduce conduction disease risk. Understanding factors that influence conduction system disease development may help inform novel primary prevention strategies. Recent evidence suggests that treatment of hypertension may play a key role in the prevention of conduction disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39831954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.