ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025
Three-dimensional genome architecture in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a common primary hepatic tumors with a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%. Therefore, it is crucial to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of ICC. Recently, the advance of high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) technology help us look insight into the three-dimensional (3D) genome structure variation during tumorigenesis. However, its function in ICC pathogenesis remained unclear.
methodsHi-C and RNA-sequencing were applied to analyze 3D genome structures and gene expression in ICC and adjacent noncancerous hepatic tissue (ANHT). Furthermore, the dysregulated genes due to 3D genome changes were validated via quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry.
resultsPrimarily, the intrachromosomal interactions of chr1, chr2, chr3, and chr11 and the interchromosomal interactions of chr1-chr10, chr13-chr21, chr16-chr19, and chr19-chr22 were also significantly distinct between ANHT and ICC, which may potentially contribute to the activation of cell migration and invasion via the upregulation of WNT10A, EpCAM, S100A3/A6, and MAPK12. Interestingly, 56 compartment regions from 23 chromosomes underwent A to B or B to A transitions during ICC oncogenesis, which attenuated the complement pathway through the downregulation of C8A/C8B, F7, F10, and F13B. Notably, topologically associated domain (TAD) rearrangements were identified in the region containing HOPX (chr4: 57,514,154-57,522,688) and ACVR1 (chr2:158,592,958-158,732,374) in ICC, which may contribute to the hijacking of remote enhancers that were previously outside the TAD and increased expression of HOPX and ACVR1.
conclusionsThis study reveals relationship between 3D genome structural variations and gene dysregulation during ICC tumorigenesis, indicating the molecular mechanisms and potential biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.