ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Unveiling cross-reactivity: implications for immune response modulation in cancer.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The challenge and promise of studying human antigen-specific T cells.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Mapping the TCR landscape: computational tools empowering translational immunology and therapy design.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antigen recognition by CD8+ T-cell receptors (TCR) is crucial for immune responses to pathogens and tumors. TCRs are cross-reactive, a single TCR can recognize multiple peptide-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) complexes. The study of cross-reactivity can support the development of therapies focusing on immune modulation, such as the expansion of pre-existing T-cell clones to fight pathogens and tumors. The peptide-HLA (pHLA) surface has previously been used to identify TCR cross-reactivities. In the present work, we sought to perform a comprehensive analysis of peptide-HLA by selecting thousands of human and viral epitopes. We profit from established docking models to identify features from different spatial perspectives of HLA-A*02:01, explore similarities between self and non-self epitopes, and list potential cross-reactive epitopes of therapeutic interest. A total of 2631 unique epitopes from representative viral proteins or human proteins were modeled. We were able to demonstrate that cross-reactive CDR3 sequences from public databases recognize epitopes with similar electrostatic potential, charge, and spatial location. Using data from published studies that measured T-cell reactivity to mutated epitopes, we observed a negative correlation between epitope dissimilarity and T-cell activation. Most analysed cancer epitopes were more similar to self epitopes, yet we identified features distinguishing those more similar to viral antigens. Finally, we enumerated potential cross-reactivities between tumoral and viral epitopes and highlighted some challenges in their identification for therapeutic use. Moreover, the thousands of peptide-HLA complexes generated in our work constitute a valuable resource to study T-cell cross-reactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.