Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831739›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

The Association Between Neutrophil-Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio (NPAR) and Mortality Among Individuals With Cancer: Insights From National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Xinyang Li, Meng Wu, Minxin Chen, Rufei Liu, Qingxu Tao, Yun Hu, Jinming Yu, Dawei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A clinical-radiomic model based on best subset regression for prognostic prediction in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyang LiShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Meng WuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Minxin ChenShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Rufei LiuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Qingxu TaoShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yun HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jinming YuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Dawei ChenShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-7997

Funding

Beijing Bethune Charitable FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China 82030082National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172676National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373217Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2020LZL014Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2020LZL016Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2020MH235Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2021YQ52The Key Research and Development Program of Shandong (Major Science & Technology Innovation Project) 2021SFGC0501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutrophils interact with tumor cells, potentially exacerbating cancer progression. Additionally, decreased albumin levels are a marker of poor cancer prognosis. The neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) has been used for prognostic assessment in non-cancerous diseases, but its relationship with mortality risk in cancer patients has not been explored. Therefore, we utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to investigate the correlation between NPAR and the risks of all-cause mortality and cancer-related mortality among cancer patients.

methodsThis study leveraged comprehensive NHANES data spanning 2005-2016. We analyzed the relationship between NPAR and the risks of cancer incidence, all-cause mortality, and cancer-related mortality using weighted Logistic and Cox regression models, as well as trend tests. Restricted cubic spline analysis was employed to investigate NPAR's nonlinear relationship with mortality risk. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to assess patient prognoses across varying NPAR levels.

resultsElevated NPAR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-related mortality in cancer patients (p < 0.05), with higher NPAR values correlating with greater risk (p-trend < 0.05). However, no significant association between NPAR and cancer incidence was observed (p > 0.05). Our analysis further identified a non-linear relationship between NPAR and all-cause mortality risk (p-nonlinear < 0.05), while no non-linear relationship was found with cancer-related mortality risk. The relationship is characterized by an optimal NPAR value, correlating with the lowest hazard ratio (HR). Deviations from this optimal NPAR result in increased all-cause mortality risk (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated superior survival rates in patients with lower NPAR values compared to those with higher NPAR values (p < 0.05).

conclusionsAccording to our study, higher NPAR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cancer-related mortality in cancer patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeutrophilsSerum AlbuminAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrognosisUnited StatesSerum Albumincancermortalityneutrophil‐percentage‐to‐albumin ratiosurvival

Identifiers

PMID39831739
PMCPMC11744675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.