ArticleSICOT-J2025
The rectus abdominis tendon insertion to the pubic bone and its clinical implications: A cadaveric study.
Article in SICOT-J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary aim of this study is to determine the rectus abdominis tendon (RAT) insertional anatomy and consequently clarify the extension of secure mobilization of the tendon from the pubic bone in the setting of anterior approaches in pelvic and acetabular reconstruction surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsEleven fresh frozen cadaveric pelvises were dissected by two fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons utilizing the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP). The RAT at the pubic body was dissected, and its footprint on the pubic bone was defined, marked, and measured.
resultsNineteen (19) RAT insertions were analyzed. The average total medial vertical length was 33 mm (range 26-42 mm), and the average total lateral vertical length was 36.5 mm (range 26-46 mm). The total width of the proximal insertion on both sides was measured at an average of 20.42 mm (range 14-24 mm). The average width of the tendon at the transition area between the cranial and caudal areas of the pubic bone was 16.45 mm (range 12-22 mm). The average distal insertion width of the RAT was less than the proximal and middle widths, measuring 10.45 mm (range 8-13 mm).
conclusionThe tendon can be safely mobilized up to an average total medial vertical length of 33 mm (and in no case more than 42 mm) and to an average total lateral vertical length of 36.5 mm (and in no case more than 46 mm). This piece of anatomical information will equip orthopaedic surgeons with a better understanding of the insertional anatomy of the RAT and subsequent safer surgical release when performing anterior approaches to the pelvic ring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.