Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831697›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025

Considerations and experiences with healthcare-seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark.

Isabella Raasthøj Holst, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Peter Haastrup, Sonja Wehberg, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabella Raasthøj HolstThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-9320
Lisa Maria Sele SætreThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-3301
Gitte Bruun LauridsenThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-6182
Kirubakaran BalasubramaniamThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-1731
Peter HaastrupThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-743X
Sonja WehbergThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-2649
Dorte Ejg JarbølThe Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3241-4190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo (1) examine considerations before and experiences with GP contact during the first COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown among Danish citizens; (2) analyse the associations with sex, age, chronic disease, and socioeconomic factors; and (3) explore changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.

methodA total of 100,000 Danes aged 20 years or older, randomly selected in the general population, were invited to participate in a survey examining considerations and experiences with healthcare seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Data were collected in spring 2022 and linked to register data on socioeconomic factors. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied.

resultsOf the 27,369 eligible individuals, 18% reported a need to contact their GP. Being worried about burdening the healthcare system was most frequently reported (45%), followed by being in doubt about acceptable contact reasons (33%), and concern about infection (24%). Although 44% of those who needed to contact their GP found the digital solutions advantageous, individuals frequently found it difficult to discuss symptoms by telehealth (29%) and that they were examined less thoroughly. Generally, women, younger people, and individuals with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to be worried and report difficulties with contact to general practice. Some 86% of the respondents reported no changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.

conclusionThe results may assist in the organisation of healthcare in case of future lockdowns. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic has only slightly affected the healthcare-seeking behaviour in the Danish general population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedAge FactorsChronic DiseaseDenmarkFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsCOVID-19general practicehelp-seeking behaviourprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39831697
PMCPMC12090286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.