ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2025
Evaluation of Cannabis Per Se Laws: A Semi-Mechanistic Pharmacometrics Model for Quantitative Characterization of THC and Metabolites in Oral Users.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Bridging THC Knowledge Gaps for Safer Roads: A Call for Action.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recreational cannabis use has increased notably in the United States in the past decade, with a recent surge in oral consumption. This trend has raised concerns about driving under the influence. Current cannabis-impaired driving laws lack standardization, with some states implementing blood Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) per se limits (1, 2, and 5 ng/mL). However, these limits have been criticized for their inaccuracy and unreliability, highlighting the need for legal refinement. Addressing this issue requires understanding the complex pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of THC, cannabis's primary psychoactive component, which can be characterized using a population PK model. However, existing PK models mainly focus on inhalation data and do not account for the growing number of oral cannabis users. To bridge this gap, a semi-mechanistic population PK model was developed using data from 10 published studies following intravenous or oral administration of cannabis to characterize THC and its metabolites in oral users. Simulated THC plasma concentrations for doses from 2.5 mg to 100 mg in frequent and occasional users were used to evaluate the effectiveness of existing per se limits. Results showed that the 1 ng/mL limit was least effective due to a high risk of false positives, while the 2 and 5 ng/mL limits remain inconclusive due to limited PD data linking blood THC levels to impairment. These findings suggest that the existing per se laws may not fully address the complexity of cannabis impairment, underscoring the need for further research and refinement of cannabis-impaired driving laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.