Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831571›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2025

Retrospective Cohort Study: Scope for Improvement-Barriers to Post-Polypectomy Surveillance in the Integrated Technologies for Improved Polyp Surveillance Cohort.

Charlotte Mathews, Aleena Nauman, Mark Johnstone, Reiss Stoops, Alexander Tham, Emma C Parsons, Kathryn A Robb, William Sloan, Gerard Lynch, Joanne Edwards and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte MathewsSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Aleena NaumanSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Mark JohnstoneSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Reiss StoopsSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Alexander ThamSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Emma C ParsonsSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Kathryn A RobbSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK.
William SloanNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Research and Innovation, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Gerard LynchSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne EdwardsSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen T McSorleySchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Garscube Estate, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5459-8445
INCISE collaborative group

Funding

Innovate UK 10054829Innovate UK 105858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to post-polypectomy surveillance is poor despite evidence that it is associated with lower risk of future colorectal cancer.

methodsWe evaluated 6,210 bowel screening participants between 2009-2016 in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to assess potential barriers to post-polypectomy surveillance.

resultsIncreasing deprivation (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile 1 vs 5; OR 1.68; p < 0.001), and increasing comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 1-2 vs 3-4; OR 1.80; p < 0.001, vs ≥ 5; OR 3.31; p < 0.001), were associated with non-surveillance in British Society of Gastroenterology 2002 intermediate/high-risk patients, while ACE-Inhibitor (OR 0.78; p < 0.001) and aspirin use (OR 0.34; p < 0.001) were associated with undergoing surveillance. The most deprived patients receiving surveillance had more metachronous polyps (54.0% vs 49.3%) and cancer (1.1% vs 0.4%) (p = 0.044). DISCUSSION: Patients from more socioeconomically deprived areas are less likely to have appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance, and are more likely to have metachronous polyps and colorectal cancer even when they do.

conclusionSurveillance strategies must take into account factors including socioeconomic deprivation and comorbidity exist to improve surveillance uptake in this group through the design of targeted interventions which move away from the current "one size fits all" approach.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesScotlandadenomacolorectaldeprivationpolypsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID39831571
PMCPMC11950799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.