Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831471›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Living in Biological Darkness II: Impact of Winter Habitual Daytime Light on Night-Time Sleep.

Claudia Nowozin, Amely Wahnschaffe, Jan de Zeeuw, Alexandra Papakonstantinou, Sven Hädel, Andrea Rodenbeck, Frederik Bes, Dieter Kunz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia NowozinInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Amely WahnschaffeInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan de ZeeuwInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexandra PapakonstantinouClinic Sleep & Chronomedicine, St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.
Sven HädelInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea RodenbeckSleep Clinic, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Goettingen-Weende, Göttingen, Germany.
Frederik BesInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0318-6093
Dieter KunzInstitute of Physiology, Sleep Research & Clinical Chronobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-5878

Funding

German Ministry of Education and Research 13N8973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timing and architecture of sleep are co-driven by circadian rhythms modulated by their major Zeitgeber light and darkness. In a natural environment, one is exposed to 3.000 lx (cloudy winter sky) to 100.000 lx (bright sunny sky). The aim of the study was to assess (1) habitual daytime light exposure in urban winter and (2) impact of daytime urban light on objective night-time sleep. Eleven healthy participants (mean age ± SD: 25.4 ± 2.8 years; 6 male) wore eyeglass frames continuously recording daytime illuminance levels vertically to the eye by mounted sensors (range: 1-40.000 lx) during four consecutive days in winter 2008 in Berlin, Germany. In-lab polysomnography was performed over two nights in nine participants. Median light exposure over 4 days was the following: full day 7:00-19:00 h: 23 lx (12-37 lx); morning 7:00-11:00 h: 81 lx (19-201 lx); midday 11:00-15:00 h: 68 lx (19-164 lx); afternoon 15:00-19:00 h: 22 lx (6-58 lx), resulting in only 36 min > 500 lx per day. Timing of daytime light intensity was significantly associated with subsequent sleep: lower midday illuminance with shorter REM latency (Rho = 0.817; p = 0.049) and earlier REM polarity (less prevalence of REM at end-of-sleep; Rho = 0.817; p = 0.049). Humans, living in an urban environment, appear to be exposed to extremely low light levels, which we named as 'Living in Biological Darkness'. Most fascinating, physiology seems to adapt and responds to variation in light intensity on such low levels. Interestingly, the observed changes in sleep architecture with low light levels are reminiscent of those suspected to constitute biological markers of depression some 40-50 years ago.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmDarknessLightSeasonsSleepAdultFemaleHumansMalePolysomnographyYoung Adultbiological darknessdepression markerhabitual daytime lightingREM latencysleepSWS

Identifiers

PMID39831471
PMCPMC11744753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.