Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831454›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2025

RETRACTION: Transcriptional Regulation of βsecretase-1 by 12/15-Lipoxygenase Results in Enhanced Amyloidogenesis and Cognitive Impairments.

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

retractionJ. Chu , J.-M. Zhuo and D. Praticò , "Transcriptional Regulation of βsecretase-1 by 12/15-Lipoxygenase Results in Enhanced Amyloidogenesis and Cognitive Impairments," Annals of Neurology 71, no. 1 (2012): 57-67, https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22625. The above article, published online on 12 September 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, J.-M. Zhuo and D. Praticò; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Kenneth L. Tyler; the American Neurological Association and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The retraction has been agreed upon due to the duplication of the actin blots and one of the APP blots shown in figures 2A and 4A. The authors were unable to provide the original data. The editors and the authors, J.-M. Zhuo and D. Praticò, have lost confidence in the data presented and consider the conclusions to be substantially compromised. The author, J. Chu, could not be contacted to inform them of the retraction.

Identifiers

PMID39831454
PMCPMC11905225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.