Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831382›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Unfriendly neighbors: When facilitation does not contribute to restoration success in tidal marsh.

Karen E Tanner, Ingrid M Parker, Monique C Fountain, Alexandra S Thomsen, Kerstin Wasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Unfriendly neighbors: When facilitation does not contribute to restoration success in tidal marsh.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen E TannerEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-1658
Ingrid M ParkerEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-1827
Monique C FountainElkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Watsonville, California, USA.
Alexandra S ThomsenElkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Watsonville, California, USA.
Kerstin WassonEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-4505

Funding

California Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia State Coastal ConservancyEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department at UCSCElkhorn Slough ReserveFuture Leaders in Coastal Science AwardHardman Native Plant AwardJean H. Langenheim Graduate FellowshipUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceWildlife Conservation Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale restoration projects are an exciting and often untapped opportunity to use an experimental approach to inform ecosystem management and test ecological theory. In our $10M tidal marsh restoration project, we installed over 17,000 high marsh plants to increase cover and diversity, using these plantings in a large-scale experiment to test the benefits of clustering and soil amendments across a stress gradient. Clustered plantings have the potential to outperform widely spaced ones if plants alter conditions in ways that decrease stress for close neighbors. Here, we test whether intraspecific facilitation improves restoration outcomes using a suite of seven high marsh species native to central California salt marshes. We also applied a biochar treatment to test whether soil amendment boosts restoration success. We compared the performance of clustered and uniform plantings across the high marsh elevation gradient for 3 years. There was a strong effect of elevation on plant performance and clear signs of plant stress related to soil conditions. Clustering slightly improved the survival of one species out of seven, although clustering did not benefit that species in a follow-up experiment under more stressful conditions. By contrast, clustering had strong negative effects on the growth and/or cover of all species tested. The stressors in this system-likely related to compaction and soil salinity-were not mitigated by neighbors or biochar. The prevailing negative effect on seven species from distinct evolutionary lineages lends strong generality to our findings. We therefore conclude that for this and similar high marsh systems, intraspecific facilitation confers no benefits and practitioners should space plants widely to minimize competition. To take full advantage of the learning opportunities provided by large-scale restoration projects, we recommend including experimental treatments and monitoring the response of multiple species across years to refine best practices and inform adaptive management.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationPlantsWetlandsCaliforniaSoilSoilcompetitionestuaryfacilitationintraspecific interactionsrestorationsalt marshstress gradient

Identifiers

PMID39831382
PMCPMC11744494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.