ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2025
Analysis of Social Genetic Effects on Pigs Fed With Automatic Feeders Using a Visit-Based Approach.
Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social behaviour traits and their impact on feed efficiency are of particular interest in pig farming. The integration of automatic feeders enables the collection of multiple phenotypes for breeding purposes. The additive genetic and social genetic effect can be estimated considering all the visits to the feeder by modelling each visit independently in a 'visit-based approach'. This study aimed to determine the impact of the social genetic effect on individual feed intake and duration per visit in Pietrain pigs and Iberian pigs separately. The dataset comprised 883,906 visits from 1608 Pietrain pigs and 775,054 visits from 856 Iberian pigs. In the Pietrain population, the social genetic effects did not explain a substantial percentage of the phenotypic variance (~1%). In contrast, the Iberian population exhibited more substantial contributions, with social genetic effects accounting for 6.2% of the variance in duration per visit and 5.5% in feed intake per visit. The correlations between additive direct genetic and additive social genetic effects were slightly positive for feed intake across all analyses, and around zero for duration per visit with most of them including the zero in the highest posterior density interval (HPD95%). These weak correlations suggest that both effects could be selected independently. The visit-based approach successfully identified social genetic effects in the studied populations. Models incorporating social genetic effects demonstrated lower residual variance, enhancing the accuracy of additive values and, consequently, the potential for an improved response to selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.