ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Phoenix Comprehensive Assessment of Pectus Excavatum Symptoms (PCAPES).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitral Valve Prolapse and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Evidence in Both Directions and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Role of preoperative echocardiography in 639 pectus excavatum: structural and functional cardiac alterations in a large cohort.Journal of echocardiography · 2026Article
- Extension of the minimally invasive pectus repair to adult patients: strategies for success.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Pectus Excavatum in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Article
- Pectus Excavatum-A Frequent but Often Neglected Entity in Sports Cardiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long term evaluation of patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergone successfuL Nuss procedure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pectus excavatum (PE) can cause cardiopulmonary compression with a wide range of symptoms and psychosocial effects. Few validated surveys assess the extensive symptomatology of the adult pectus population. A comprehensive symptom survey was developed and validated with outcomes presented. Methods: An observational and validation study of a novel symptom survey [Phoenix Comprehensive Assessment of Pectus Excavatum Symptoms (PCAPES)] was performed that included patients evaluated for PE from October 2020-September 2021 at Mayo Clinic Arizona. Survey validation was performed in three phases. Results: After survey validation, 432 patients completed the PCAPES survey: median age was 30 years [interquartile range (IQR), 23.0, 39.9 years], 57.8% males, median Haller index: 4.2 (IQR, 3.6, 5.4). Common neurological complaints included headaches (74%) and positional dizziness (67%). Regarding cardiovascular symptoms, 6/7 exercise related questions had at least 70% of patients reporting limitations or inability to perform. Pulmonary-wise, >80% noted restricted breathing both with normal activity and during exercise. For gastrointestinal symptoms, nearly half reported some degree of dysphagia with 52% noting post-prandial dyspnea. Psychosocially, patients reported either avoiding activities where their chest could be visible (68%) or feeling bothered by the overall appearance of their chest (80%). Commonly reported complaints were feelings of depression and anxiety (65% each). Females and older patients (≥30) were more severely affected with cardiac symptoms (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Despite being more symptomatic, females were more likely to feel dismissed by their physicians. Conclusions: Pectus causes a variety of symptoms, and a comprehensive survey should be performed for assessment and indication of further testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.