ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From tradition to evidence: a narrative review for standardizing chest tube management after anatomic lung resection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of chest tube clamping versus non-clamping prior to removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. "Provocative clamping" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax. Results: This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted. Conclusions: Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.