Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831230›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.

Zihao Zhou, Cheng Deng, Maoyu Qin, Jie Yang, Takahiro Homma, Song Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zihao ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng DengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Maoyu QinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jie YangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Takahiro HommaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Song DongGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. "Provocative clamping" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax. Results: This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted. Conclusions: Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.

Indexed as

chest tube managementearly postoperative air leakProvocative clampingpulmonary resectionvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID39831230
PMCPMC11740057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.