ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection for deep interlobar lung cancer with fused fissure.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The technical challenges associated with the removal of small nodules in challenging locations rather than peripheral locations remain unaddressed. We sought to illustrate the parenchymal-sparing surgical approach employed for deep interlobar lung cancer with fused fissures (DILCFFs). Methods: A retrospective review of 43 patients with cT1N0M0 DILCFFs from January 2013 through December 2022 was performed. Patients were grouped into the non-anatomical extended resection (NER): either a lobectomy or a (sub)segmentectomy for the predominant location with an extended wedge resection of a portion of an adjacent lobe, and the anatomical resection (AR): combined a lobectomy or a (sub)segmentectomy for the predominant location with a (sub)segmentectomy of an adjacent lobe. Results: In total, 17 patients underwent NER, 26 with AR. There were more cases undergoing preoperative nodule localization in the NER group. The AR arm conferred a wider surgical margin (2.52 Conclusions: AR of partial of the adjacent lobe provides a wider surgical margin than that of NER in the removal of DILCFFs, potentially accounting for the lower incidence of margin failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.