ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Thirty years of lung transplantation: development of postoperative outcome and survival over three decades.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridging on postoperative acute kidney injury after lung transplantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Article
- HLA-DQ7 De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies Are Associated with Increased Risk of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Four decades of heart-lung transplantation: Milestones and outcomes in advanced cardiorespiratory failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The Role of Microbiology at the 1-Month Surveillance Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Identification of Complications in the First Year After Lung-Transplantation-A Retrospective Single-Center Experience.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation (LuTX) can be the last resort for patients with end-stage lung diseases. In the last decades, improvements were implemented in transplant medicine, from immunosuppression throughout preservation of the donor organ to enhance lung allograft survival. This retrospective study aims to illustrate the development of the LuTX-program at the University Hospital of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany, since its launch in 1990 by depicting and comparing postoperative outcome. Methods: We analyzed all LuTX performed from 1990 to 2019. Data was collected on indication for transplantation (TX), date, type (double/single) and postoperative survival. Survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimator were used to identify factors that are detrimental to post-LuTX-outcome. Results: A total of 1,054 LuTX were performed over 30 years, comprising overall 1,024 patients (30 retransplantations). The best results regarding five-year survival rates (5-YSR) were observed in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (5-YSR: LAM: 78.6%, HP: 73.6%). We could show that besides that the type of LuTX played a crucial role in post-TX survival, depicting double superior to single LuTX (5-YSR: single: 47.2%, double: 64.5%). Additionally, cytomegalovirus (CMV) risk constellation (high/intermediate risk; P=0.02) and infection (P<0.001) were identified as risk factors for deteriorated survival. Conclusions: Data analysis demonstrates that the field of LuTX has undergone enormous progress over the years. Therapeutic advances and improvements in interdisciplinary cooperation, pre- and postoperative management, changes in immunosuppressive medication, diagnosis and treatment of allograft rejections have clearly improved lung allograft and patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.