ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Current landscape of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: a literature review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic and clinicopathological value of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Elbasvir triggers ferroptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Immune exhaustion in esophageal cancer: interferon pathway dysregulation and neoadjuvant therapy response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Wnt Signaling and Circular RNAs in Esophageal and Gastric Cancers: Opportunities for Early Detection and Targeted Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Surgical Timing and Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: Insights from One- and Two-Stage Esophagectomies in a Polish Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Esophageal cancer has witnessed a significant shift in its epidemiology within the United States. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is now the fastest-growing solid malignancy, surpassing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in frequency. There has been a concentrated effort to establish new therapies for dealing with this malignancy including immunotherapy in conjunction with surgery and radiotherapy. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current therapeutic strategies for esophageal cancer, with a particular focus on the emerging role of immunotherapy in combination with surgery and radiotherapy, and its impact on treatment outcomes. Methods: A thorough search was done using keywords of "esophageal cancer", "immunotherapy in esophageal cancer", and "immunotherapy" in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases. All studies that were identified in this search were analyzed for relevance and content. Key Content and Findings: A total of 1,555 studies were identified which were checked for relevance and content. Fifteen articles were reviewed which focused on esophageal cancer and the immunotherapy directed towards this condition. This review article summarizes the most recent and available evidence on immunotherapy directed towards the treatment of esophageal cancer. Conclusions: Esophageal cancer treatment is undergoing a paradigm shift with the advent of immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. These therapies hold promise for both second-line and first-line settings, with evolving biomarkers guiding treatment decisions. Combination strategies and personalized approaches are actively investigated to overcome resistance mechanisms and enhance treatment outcomes in this challenging cancer type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.