Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831179›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Autonomic Reflexes With Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT).

Ito Hirobumi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ito HirobumiOtolaryngology, Ito ENT Clinic, Funabashi, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A literature review was conducted of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) in the treatment of chronic epipharyngitis, focusing on the mechanism of action by autonomic nerve stimulation. The mechanism of action of EAT in stimulating the immune system has recently become clear. However, the mechanism of action of EAT on the autonomic nervous system remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the still not fully understood mechanism of EAT stimulation of the autonomic nervous system in chronic epipharyngitis by collecting and integrating previous studies and papers focusing on the autonomic nerve stimulating effects of EAT. The EAT stimulates a network of brainstem neurons involved in swallowing, vomiting, breathing, and circulatory centers, and further affects endocrine reflexes via the hypothalamus and pituitary, and stress responses via the limbic system. The EAT reflex is hierarchically integrated and is thought to reflexively control not only the pharyngeal reflex but also autonomic functions such as airway, breathing, cardiovascular, cerebral circulation, digestive, and endocrine glands. The immune system, endocrine system, and autonomic nervous system are thought to interact with each other to produce the therapeutic effect of EAT. It is important to determine which mechanism is predominantly involved in each case of chronic epipharyngitis and to utilize it in treatment. Elucidating the mechanism of action of EAT autonomic nerve stimulation will be an important guideline in determining the treatment strategy for chronic epipharyngitis.

Indexed as

autonomic nerve activity regulationbaroreceptor reflexchronic epipharyngitis(nasopharyngitis)eat reflexepipharyngeal abrasive therapy (eat)parasympathetic nerve stimulationpharyngeal reflexsympathetic nerve stimulationtrigeminal autonomic reflexvagal cardiac reflex

Identifiers

PMID39831179
PMCPMC11740199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.