ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2024
Self-supervised pretraining in the wild imparts image acquisition robustness to medical image transformers: an application to lung cancer segmentation.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MHub.ai: A Standardized Platform for Reproducible AI Research in Medical Imaging.Research square · 2026Article
- LEARNABLE HIERARCHICAL VISUAL CONTEXTS FOR TUMOR SEGMENTATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026Article
- BENCHMARKING TRANSFERABILITY OF SELF-SUPERVISED PRETRAINING FOR MULTI-ORGAN SEGMENTATION ON DIFFERENT MODALITIES.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- Next-Gen Medical Imaging: U-Net Evolution and the Rise of Transformers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is an approach to pretrain models with unlabeled datasets and extract useful feature representations such that these models can be easily fine-tuned for various downstream tasks. Self-pretraining applies SSL on curated task-specific datasets without using task-specific labels. Increasing availability of public data repositories has now made it possible to utilize diverse and large, task unrelated datasets to pretrain models in the "wild" using SSL. However, the benefit of such wild-pretraining over self-pretraining has not been studied in the context of medical image analysis. Hence, we analyzed transformers (Swin and ViT) and a convolutional neural network created using wild- and self-pretraining trained to segment lung tumors from 3D-computed tomography (CT) scans in terms of: (a) accuracy, (b) fine-tuning epoch efficiency, and (c) robustness to image acquisition differences (contrast versus non-contrast, slice thickness, and image reconstruction kernels). We also studied feature reuse using centered kernel alignment (CKA) with the Swin networks. Our analysis with two independent testing (public N = 139; internal N = 196) datasets showed that wild-pretrained Swin models significantly outperformed self-pretrained Swin for the various imaging acquisitions. Fine-tuning epoch efficiency was higher for both wild-pretrained Swin and ViT models compared to their self-pretrained counterparts. Feature reuse close to the final encoder layers was lower than in the early layers for wild-pretrained models irrespective of the pretext tasks used in SSL. Models and code will be made available through GitHub upon manuscript acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39831171PMC11741178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.