Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831152›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2025

Public's perception of policies reducing tobacco availability by regulating the tobacco retail environment: A case study in Egypt.

Raouf Alebshehy, Eman H Elsebaie, Oliver Razum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raouf AlebshehySchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Eman H ElsebaiePublic Health and Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Oliver RazumSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe tobacco industry presence in the retail environment ensures its access to current and potential tobacco users. Reduction of tobacco retail is an emerging tobacco control measure. Many policies that would potentially lead to reduction in retail are not covered by international tobacco laws and are individually adopted in some jurisdictions. This study examines public perception on potential effect of suggested policies in one of the few countries where tobacco market is increasing, Egypt.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey study was implemented in Egypt, June 2023 to March 2024 to assess the perception of the public towards 12 suggested policies that aim to reduce both tobacco availability and purchase by regulating the tobacco retail environment. The survey was disseminated through social media and 320 completed responses were received. Responses on perception followed five-point Likert scales.

resultsParticipants felt they could easily access tobacco products around places of residence, work, and study. The largest proportion of participants (53.1%) reported good agreement that the suggested policies would have an impact in reducing tobacco availability and retail, while 39.7% had fair agreement, and only 7.2% had poor agreement.

conclusionsMost participants believe that policies reducing tobacco availability and sales would be effective. Non-users rated these policies as more effective than tobacco users. Younger adults viewed these policies more favorably than older adults. The study suggests public support for tobacco control measures to address the prevalent tobacco retail environment in Egypt, indicating a need for policymakers to adopt these measures to protect future generations. Additional research using larger randomly selected populations in Egypt is needed to corroborate these results.

Indexed as

public opinionregulationsretailtobaccotobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID39831152
PMCPMC11740601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.