Efficacy of shared decision making in tobacco cessation among health facilities of Haryana, India - A double blinded, parallel group Randomized Controlled trial Protocol.

Pranav Kshtriya, Sonu Goel, Abhishek Ghosh

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pranav KshtriyaDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Sonu GoelDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Abhishek GhoshDepartment of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) incorporates evidence, patient values, and preferences into medical decision-making. SDM and decision aids might promote health professional engagement and patient knowledge of tobacco cessation therapy, improving usage and results. The SDM facilitates talks that lead to better-informed judgements that align with patients' priorities, unlike individual decision-making. Thus, the study will attempt to identify the efficacy of shared decision making in tobacco dependence treatment. Methods: 1) Discussion: SDM in tobacco cessation therapies in healthcare settings is understudied, thereby this study looks at comparable interventions in different settings to add to the evidence. This suggests that this study on SDM in tobacco cessation therapy, which includes healthcare professionals, aims to assist patients in making evidence- and value-based medical decisions. Trial registration: This protocol has been registered under the registration number CTRI/2022/10/046793 with the Clinical Trials Registry in India.

Indexed as

Randomized controlled trialShared decision makingTobacco cessationTobacco cessation center

Identifiers

PMID39831084

DOI10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100581

PMCPMC11742332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.