ReviewBiophysics reviews2025
Recent advances in the tools and techniques for AI-aided diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Atrial Fibrillation Detection on the Embedded Edge: Energy-Efficient Inference on a Low-Power Microcontroller.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as a developing global epidemic responsible for a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. To counter this public health crisis, the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI)-aided tools and methodologies for the effective detection and monitoring of AF is becoming increasingly apparent. A unified strategy from the international research community is essential to develop effective intelligent tools and technologies to support the health professionals for effective surveillance and defense against AF. This review delves into the practical implications of AI-aided tools and techniques for AF detection across different clinical settings including screening, diagnosis, and ambulatory monitoring by reviewing the revolutionary research works. The key finding is that the advance in AI and its use for automatic detection of AF has achieved remarkable success, but collaboration between AI and human intelligence is required for trustworthy diagnostic of this life-threatening cardiac condition. Moreover, designing efficient and robust intelligent algorithms for onboard AF detection using portable and implementable computing devices with limited computation power and energy supply is a crucial research problem. As modern wearable devices are equipped with sophisticated embedded sensors, such as optical sensors and accelerometers, hence photoplethysmography and ballistocardiography signals could be explored as an affordable alternative to electrocardiography (ECG) signals for AF detection, particularly for the development of low-cost and miniature screening and monitoring devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.