Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831026›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2023

Influenza-type epidemic risks by spatio-temporal Gaidai-Yakimov method.

Oleg Gaidai, Vladimir Yakimov, Eric-Jan van Loon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oleg GaidaiShanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China.
Vladimir YakimovCentral Marine Research and Design Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Eric-Jan van LoonGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global public health was recently hampered by reported widespread spread of new coronavirus illness, although morbidity and fatality rates were low. Future coronavirus infection rates may be accurately predicted over a long-time horizon, using novel bio-reliability approach, being especially well suitable for environmental multi-regional health and biological systems. The high regional dimensionality along with cross-correlations between various regional datasets being challenging for conventional statistical tools to manage. Methods: To assess future risks of epidemiological outbreak in any province of interest, novel spatio-temporal technique has been proposed. In a multicenter, population-based environment, assess raw clinical data using state-of-the-art, cutting-edge statistical methodologies. Results: Authors have developed novel reliable long-term risk assessment methodology for future coronavirus infection outbreaks. Conclusions: Based on national clinical patient monitoring raw dataset, it is concluded that although underlying data set data quality is questionable, the proposed method may be still applied.

Indexed as

AI (artificial intelligence)COVID-19Epidemic outbreakPublic healthRisk forecastSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39831026
PMCPMC11742348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.