ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend application of the 99th percentile to determine the cut-off value on at least 120 healthy donors regardless of sex for lupus anticoagulant (LA) ratio of each step. However, a statistically significant difference between the sexes has been found for LA ratio recently. Objectives: To clarify whether this sex difference in dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) exists in various detection systems and the necessity of setting sex-specific cut-off values. Methods: Blood samples from healthy donors were detected on 3 DRVVT detection systems, and the sex-specific cut-offs of DRVVT test were obtained based on the 99th or 97.5th centile of screen, confirm, and normalized ratios (NRs) grouped by sex in each system. One thousand one hundred twenty one female patients with suspected antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were retrospectively investigated, the APS-associated clinical and laboratory characteristics of female patients stratified by different cut-offs of DRVVT ratio were compared. Results: The DRVVT NRs of females were significantly lower than those of males on each system. The female patients with DRVVT NR between female-specific and regardless of sex cut-offs had higher positive rates of silica clotting time test and LA retest results after 12 weeks than those with DRVVT NRs lower than female-specific cut-off, there were also more patients who met the APS clinical criteria. Conclusion: The sex difference of the cut-off value for DRVVT LA test is confirmed on multiple systems, the female-specific cut-off is lower than regardless of sex cut-off and may lead to more female patients being considered as high-risk population for APS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.