ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Characterization of bleeding in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the precaplacizumab era: a retrospective nationwide analysis.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Series and Literature Narrative Review of Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hematologic safety of caplacizumab in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: insights from platelet-related signal detection in the FAERS database.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The addition of caplacizumab to immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (iTTP) treatment options has led to a renewed interest in characterizing the epidemiology and risk factors for bleeding in iTTP. Limited data exist on the bleeding risk in iTTP due to systemic underreporting in earlier cohorts. Objectives: To describe the incidence, patterns, and predictors of bleeding in hospitalized iTTP patients independent of caplacizumab use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database (2012-2019) and identified adult patients with a diagnosis of iTTP. Predictors of bleeding were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: We identified 3103 iTTP hospitalizations; bleeding occurred in 594 (19.1%), and 157 (5.1%) were characterized by major bleeding. Mucocutaneous bleeding (7.6%) was the most frequent type of bleeding and included heavy menstrual bleeding (2.6%), gingival (2.3%), epistaxis (1.4%), and skin/procedure-related bleeding (1.3%). This was followed closely by gastrointestinal bleeding (5.6%). Patients with bleeding were more likely to be Hispanic, have a weekend admission, and have a higher prevalence of comorbidities. In the multivariable analysis, Hispanic race (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 1.14-1.91), Asian/Pacific Islander/Native American race (OR, 2.04; 1.51-2.76), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.70; 1.38-2.11), heart failure (OR, 1.39; 1.13-1.72), autoimmune disease (OR, 2.61; 2.08-3.26), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 (OR, 2.08; 1.66-2.61), weekend admission (OR, 1.45; 1.22-1.72), and delay ≥2 days in plasma exchange initiation (OR, 1.63; 1.38-1.92), were significantly associated with major bleeding. Conclusions: Bleeding is a relatively common issue in acute iTTP that has not been adequately addressed in existing literature. Further studies are needed to elucidate this risk and associated factors, especially given the incorporation of caplacizumab in the treatment of iTTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.