Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830945›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Xin-Guang Bao, Pei-Fang Chong, Cai He, Xue-Mei Lu, Xue-Ying Wang, Feng Zhang, Bing-Bing Tan, Jia-Li Yang, Li-Li Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive Evaluation of Five Pecan (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin-Guang BaoKey Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Gansu Agricultural University, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China.
Pei-Fang ChongKey Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Gansu Agricultural University, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, China.
Cai HeInstitute for Desertification Control and Prevention, Wuwei Academy of Forestry, Wuwei, China.
Xue-Mei LuMinqin County Liangucheng Psammophytes Nature Reserve Management Station, Wuwei, China.
Xue-Ying WangCollege of Forest of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China.
Feng ZhangCollege of Forest of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China.
Bing-Bing TanCollege of Forest of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China.
Jia-Li YangCollege of Forest of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China.
Li-Li GaoCollege of Forest of Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil salinization poses a significant ecological and environmental challenge both in China and across the globe. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) enhance plants' resilience against biotic and abiotic stresses, thereby playing a vital role in soil improvement and vegetation restoration efforts. PGPR assist plants in thriving under salt stress by modifying plant physiology, enhancing nutrient absorption, and synthesizing plant hormones. However, the mechanisms through which PGPR regulate the contents of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), and biomass allocation of desert plant in response to salt stress is still unclear. This study explores the impact of PGPR on biomass allocation, C, and N contents of

Indexed as

biomass allocationEnterobacterReaumuria soongoricasalt stressstoichiometry

Identifiers

PMID39830945
PMCPMC11739099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.