ArticleMethodsX2025
HybNet: A hybrid deep models for medicinal plant species identification.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A lightweight hybrid CNN and transformer model for medicinal leaf disease classification with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time plant species detection plays an important role in fields ranging from medicine to biodiversity conservation. Images captured under unconstrained environments, scale variations, different lighting conditions, leaf orientation, complicated backdrops, and leaflet structure make plant species recognition rigorous and time-consuming. Our study addresses this challenge by introducing three pioneering hybrid models, seamlessly integrating the strengths of convolution neural networks. In the first model, two deep learning models such as VGG16 and MobileNet are fused to extract features. Then, the extracted features are subjected to KNN classifier achieving an impressive 85.85 % accuracy, while the second model adopts MobileNet in conjunction with ResNet50 for feature extraction which is further classified using a deep learning classifier to achieve 88 % accuracy. The third model incorporates MobileNetV2 with the Squeeze and Excitation (SE) layers for the classification tasks. Our research highlights the immense potential of modern image processing techniques and deep learning models in comprehending and safeguarding the earth's diverse plant species. The experiments are carried out on self-created medicinal plant datasets captured in real-time conditions. From the experimentations, it is observed that hybrid model 3 reflects an improved performance of 94.24 % by utilizing recalibration efforts compared with the other two hybrid models.•One of the significant contributions of the study lies in a focused emphasis on feature enhancement achieved through the utilization of hybrid models majorly to enrich the features.•The feature scaling model incorporated in hybrid model 3 exhibits a superior and better performance demonstrating higher accuracy compared to the other models presented in this work.•The deebp learning models are trained and tested on the small dataset yet achieved good accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.