ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Integrative and syntactic complexity's role in decision-making under uncertainty.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated scoring of adult ego development from sentence completions: interpretable maturity indicators derived by evolutionary prompt optimization.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the impact of integrative complexity (IC) and syntactic complexity (SC) on decision-making under uncertainty. The research addresses how cognitive structures contribute to decision quality in ambiguous situations. A modified Ellsberg experiment was conducted using an online platform. Participants were exposed to varying levels of ambiguity, and decision support tools were introduced to assess the influence of IC and SC on decision-making. The manipulation of available information allowed for a controlled analysis of cognitive processing. The findings reveal that IC and SC significantly enhance decision quality. IC facilitates the integration of diverse information, while SC supports the comprehension and management of ambiguity. Both cognitive structures play essential roles in navigating uncertainty. These results underscore the importance of IC and SC in effective decision-making. The findings suggest that fostering these cognitive abilities may improve decision-making skills in uncertain contexts, offering practical implications for training and development in high-stakes environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.