Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830832›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2025

Purification of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles using ultrafiltration.

Rui Lei, Shuai Ren, Hua Ye, Zhanfeng Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Counting Copies, Making Medicines: A Roadmap for the MSC-EV-microRNAome.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui LeiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-2568
Shuai RenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Hua YeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Zhanfeng CuiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEVs) are pivotal for the curative effects of mesenchymal stromal cells, but their translation into clinical products is hindered by the technical challenges of scaled production and purification. Ultrafiltration, a pressure-driven membrane separation method, is well known as an efficient, scalable, and cost-effective approach for bioseparation. However, there has been little study so far that comprehensively evaluates the potential application of ultrafiltration for scaled sEV isolation and purification. In this study, the feasibility and effectiveness of ultrafiltration for MSC-sEV isolation and purification are studied, and the effects of key process design and operational parameters, including the membrane pore size, transmembrane pressure (TMP), stirring speed (shear rate), feed concentration, are quantified using a stirred cell setup. Results revealed that 500 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) polyethersulfone membrane demonstrated superior suitability for MSC-sEV separation, yielding higher purity and productivity compared to 100 and 300 kDa MWCO membranes of the same material. The MSC-sEV productivity and purity could also be improved by applying a moderate stirring speed and lower operational pressure, respectively. Isovolumetric diafiltration was incorporated to enhance the purity of MSC-sEVs, successfully removing about 99% of protein contaminants by six diafiltration volumes (DVs). Subsequently, a fed-batch ultra-diafiltration (UF/DF) process with optimised filtration parameters was developed and compared with the currently most used ultracentrifugation (UC) method, showing exceptional effectiveness and performance in the isolation of MSC-sEVs: it increased the recovery of MSC-sEV from 20.59% to 60.88% (about three folds increase) and nearly doubled the purity, while also reducing processing time from over 4 h to 3.5 h, with a potential further reduction to less than 2.5 h through automation. The study concludes that ultrafiltration could be a promising method for both lab-scale preparation and industrial-scale manufacture of MSC-sEVs, offering advantages of high recovery, scalability, fast, and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

diafiltrationmembranemesenchymal stromal cellssmall extracellular vesiclesultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID39830832
PMCPMC11739894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.