ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Utilization of Internet and Social Media by Outpatient Dermatology Patients: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Utility of Artificial Intelligence Platforms for Post-Operative Mohs Micrographic Surgery Questions: A Blinded Expert Panel Evaluation.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Article
- [Large language models-hype or hope?]Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Online health-related information (HRI) has expanded access to medical knowledge. While there are benefits to the increasing availability of online HRI, there may be limitations to the accuracy, quality of information, and utilization across patient demographics. Methods: A survey was administered to dermatology outpatients at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California to examine the utilization of internet and social media for acquiring dermatology-related information (DRI). Results: A total of 200 patients completed the survey. A majority (90%) indicated utilizing the internet to research information about their dermatological condition. Approximately 74 percent researched their dermatological condition before visiting the dermatologist, and 80 percent researched their condition after seeing a dermatologist. Younger patients (ages 18-25) were more likely to utilize online HRI before and after their visit. When stratified by income level, those with an income of less than $20,000 a year were more likely to search online for symptom management. Overwhelmingly, patients (99%) preferred to receive DRI from a dermatologist over internet or social media. Limitations: A limitation of our study is the exclusion of individuals with dermatologic issues who do not seek in-person dermatologic care, which may contribute to selection bias. Conclusion: There are differences across demographics in the utilization of the internet and social media for obtaining DRI. Understanding patients' interactions with online HRI may allow providers and patients to work synergistically, leveraging online resources to support the dissemination of credible information and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39830827PMC11741166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.