ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Topical Brimonidine Tartrate 0.33% Gel versus 577-nm Pro-yellow Laser for the Treatment of Post-acne Erythema: A Comparative Study.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting Vascular and Inflammatory Crosstalk: Cannabigerol as a Dual-Pathway Modulator in Rosacea.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post acne erythema (PAE) is a common sequela of inflammatory acne vulgaris resulting from the dilatation of microcapillaries within the papillary dermis, thinning of the epidermis, and release of inflammatory cytokines. Methods: This was a comparative study, randomized clinical trials conducted on 60 adult patients with PAE. Patients were assigned into two groups: Group I included 30 patients who received brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel once daily for three months, and Group II included 30 patients who received Pro-yellow laser with 577-nm therapy, for four sessions at three weeks intervals. Evaluation of erythema was done by Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) scales at baseline and at the end of the therapy. The dermoscopic images were analyzed for percent area of erythema and the optical density (OD) using ImageJ® freeware. Results: Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were females and eight patients (26.7%) were males in Group I. In Group II, 20 patients (66.7%) were females and 10 patients (33.3%) were males. The mean±SD age of the studied groups was 22.07 years ±2.64 ranging from 20 to 24 years in Group I versus 20.93 years ±2.88 ranging from 19 to 23 years in Group II. Clinical improvement is distributed as follows among Group I; 56.7 percent are excellent, 56.7 percent good, 26.7 percent poor, and 10 percent fair for Group II; 33.3 percent good, 6.7 percent poor, and 60 percent excellent. There was no statistically significant difference between studied groups as regard Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) mean area percentage and the optical density (OD) before treatment, while a statistically significant difference between studied groups after treatment was observed ( Conclusion: Topical brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel and 577-nm pro yellow laser were effective and well tolerated therapeutic options for treatment of Post acne erythema (PAE), however the 577-nm Pro yellow laser was superior to brimonidine tartrate 0.33% gel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39830823PMC11741167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.