Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830743›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024

Performance of deep learning model and radiomics model for preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces in the surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: a two-center comparative study.

Xiang Wang, Chao Ma, Qinling Jiang, Xuebin Zheng, Jun Xie, Chuan He, Pengchen Gu, Yanyan Wu, Yi Xiao, Shiyuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiang Wang *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chao Ma *Department of Radiology, Frist Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qinling Jiang *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2930-6598
Xuebin ZhengShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Jun XieShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Chuan HeShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Pengchen GuShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Yanyan Wu *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yi Xiao *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shiyuan Liu *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spread through air spaces (STAS) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a distinct pattern of intrapulmonary metastasis where tumor cells disseminate within the pulmonary parenchyma beyond the primary tumor margins. This phenomenon was officially included in the World Health Organization (WHO)'s classification of lung tumors in 2015. STAS is characterized by the spread of tumor cells in three forms: single cells, micropapillary clusters, and solid nests. Clinical studies have linked STAS to a poorer prognosis, higher recurrence risk, and more advanced clinicopathological staging in LUAD patients. In this study, we constructed radiomics models and deep learning models based on computed tomography (CT) for predicting preoperative STAS status in LUAD. Methods: A total of 395 (57.19±11.40 years old) patients with pathologically confirmed LUAD from two centers were enrolled in this retrospective study, in which STAS was detected in 146 patients (36.96%). The general clinical data, preoperative CT images, and the results of pathology reports of all patients were collected. Two experienced radiologists independently segmented the lesions by medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK) software. The CT-based models only, the clinical-based models only, and the fusion model based on the two were constructed using radiomics and deep learning methods, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the different models was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of the subjects' receiver operating characteristics (ROCs). Results: The deep learning model based on CT images achieved satisfactory discriminative performance in predicting STAS and outperformed the radiomics model and the clinical-radiomics model. The AUC of deep learning model was 0.918 for the internal test set and 0.766 for the external test set. The radiomics model had an AUC of 0.851 for the internal test set and an AUC of 0.699 for the external test set. The clinical-radiomics deep learning model was slightly less effective than the deep learning model (internal AUC =0.915, external AUC =0.773). Conclusions: The constructed deep learning model based on preoperative chest CT can be used to determine the STAS status of LUAD patients with good diagnostic performance and is superior to radiomics models.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)deep learningradiomicsSpread through air spaces (STAS)

Identifiers

PMID39830743
PMCPMC11736594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.