ArticleHuman reproduction open2025
The interplay between mitochondrial DNA genotypes, female infertility, ovarian response, and mutagenesis in oocytes.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current gene panels for female infertility: gaps between evidence and clinical application.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Quality Control in Bovine Oocyte Maturation: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects for Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- An overview on cardiac regeneration revolution: exploring the promise of stem cell therapies.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionIs there an association between different mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genotypes and female infertility or ovarian response, and is the appearance of variants in the oocytes favored by medically assisted reproduction (MAR) techniques? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian response was negatively associated with global non-synonymous protein-coding homoplasmic variants but positively associated with haplogroup K; the number of oocytes retrieved in a cycle correlates with the number of heteroplasmic variants in the oocytes, principally with variants located in the hypervariable (HV) region and rRNA loci, as well as non-synonymous protein-coding variants. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several genes have been shown to be positively associated with infertility, and there is growing concern that MAR may facilitate the transmission of these harmful variants to offspring, thereby passing on infertility. The potential role of mtDNA variants in these two perspectives remains poorly understood. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This cohort study included 261 oocytes from 132 women (mean age: 32 ± 4 years) undergoing ovarian stimulation between 2019 and 2020 at an academic center. The oocyte mtDNA genotypes were examined for associations with the women's fertility characteristics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsThe mtDNA of the oocytes underwent deep sequencing, and the mtDNA genotypes were compared between infertile and fertile groups using Fisher's exact test. The impact of the mtDNA genotype on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and the number of (mature) oocytes retrieved was assessed using the Mann-Whitney MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Neither homoplasmic mtDNA variants nor haplogroups in the oocytes were associated with infertility status or with AMH levels. Conversely, when the relationship between the number of oocytes retrieved and different mtDNA genotypes was examined, a positive association was observed between the number of metaphase (MII) oocytes ( LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The current work is constrained by its retrospective design and single-center approach, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings. The small sample size for specific types of infertility restricts this aspect of the findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis work suggests that mitochondrial genetics may have an impact on ovarian response and corroborates previous findings indicating that the size of the oocyte cohort after stimulation correlates with the presence of potentially deleterious variants in the oocyte. Future epidemiological and functional studies based on the results of the current study will provide valuable insights to address gaps in knowledge to assess any prospective risks for MAR-conceived offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, Grant numbers 1506617N and 1506717N to C.S.), by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Fonds, Willy Gepts Research Foundation of Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (Grant numbers WFWG14-15, WFWG16-43, and WFWG19-19 to C.S.), and by the Methusalem Grant of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (to K.S.). M.R. and E.C.d.D. were supported predoctoral fellowships by the FWO, Grant numbers 1133622N and 1S73521N, respectively. The authors declare no conflict of interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.