ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
National Trends in Stroke Presentation, Treatments, and Outcomes During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Different COVID-19 Pandemic Phases on Emergency Department Length of Stay and Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Acute Myocardial Infarction in Medicare Beneficiaries During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Changes in Healthcare Utilization Patterns and Outcomes for an Acute Cerebrovascular Events Medicare Cohort: 2018-2022.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Early presentation and acute treatment for patients presenting with ischemic stroke are associated with improved outcomes. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a large decrease in patients presenting with ischemic stroke, but it is unknown whether these changes persisted. Methods: This study analyzed emergency department (ED) stroke presentations (n = 158,060) to all nonfederal hospitals in the 50 states and Washington, D.C., from 2019 through 2021 using administrative claims data of traditional fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 66 years or older. Patients presenting with stroke were identified using the ICD-10 CM (I63.X). We examined the number of beneficiaries presenting with ischemic stroke to the ED, both overall and by demographic categories (race, age, sex, region, Medicaid eligibility, comorbidity status), admission rates conditional on presentation, use of neurovascular interventions, thirty-day mortality, intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation use, length of stay, and discharge destination. Results: With the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, there was a drop of 32.1% in ED stroke presentations compared with March 2019 levels, and by December 2021, the rate remained 17.7% lower than baseline levels in December 2019. Relative to the prepandemic period, there were decreases in the proportions of those dually eligible for Medicaid (-0.8%, Discussion: After an initial sharp decline, stroke presentations remained substantially lower than at baseline through the end of 2021, especially among racial minority and those dually eligible for Medicaid. The observed increased mortality rates for those presenting with stroke may have resulted from later time of presentation after the onset of symptoms or preferential presentation of more vs less severe strokes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.