Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830640›Full record

ReviewVaccine: X2025

Current status of the development of dengue vaccines.

Michelle Felicia Lee, Chiau Ming Long, Chit Laa Poh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A gut commensalVirulence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle Felicia LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Chiau Ming LongDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Chit Laa PohALPS Global Holding Berhad, The ICON, East Wing Tower, No. 1, Jalan 1/68F, Off Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur 50400, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue fever is caused by the mosquito-borne dengue virus (DENV), which is endemic in more than 100 countries. Annually, there are approximately 390 million dengue cases, with a small subset manifesting into severe illnesses, such as dengue haemorrhagic fever or dengue shock syndrome. Current treatment options for dengue infections remain supportive management due to the lack of an effective vaccine and clinically approved antiviral. Although the CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia®) vaccine with an overall vaccine efficacy of 60 % has been licensed for clinical use since 2015, it poses an elevated risk of severe dengue infections especially in dengue-naïve children below 9 years of age. The newly approved Qdenga vaccine was able to achieve an overall vaccine efficacy of 80 % after 12 months, but it was not able to provide a protective effect against DENV-3 in dengue naïve individuals. The Butantan-DV vaccine candidate is still undergoing phase 3 clinical trials for safety and efficacy evaluations in humans. Apart from live-attenuated vaccines, various other vaccine types are also currently being studied in preclinical and clinical studies. This review discusses the current status of dengue vaccine development.

Indexed as

Dengue virusFlavivirusLive-attenuated vaccineVaccineVaccine development

Identifiers

PMID39830640
PMCPMC11741033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.