Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830608›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network.

Tara P McAlexander, Nora L Lee, Gina S Lovasi, Annemarie G Hirsch, Melissa N Poulsen, Brian Elbel, Lorna E Thorpe, D Leann Long, Leslie A McClure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara P McAlexanderDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-3177
Nora L LeeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gina S LovasiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Annemarie G HirschDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Melissa N PoulsenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
Brian ElbelDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lorna E ThorpeDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
D Leann LongDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Leslie A McClureDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research - Translational Intervention Methodology CoreP30DK111022 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI JEFFREY GONZALEZ · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006293NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-site and multi-organizational teams are increasingly common in epidemiologic research; however, there is a lack of standards or best practices for achieving success in collaborative research networks in epidemiology. We summarize our experiences and lessons learned from the Diabetes Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities (LEAD) Network, a collaborative agreement between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and research teams at Drexel University, New York University, Johns Hopkins University and Geisinger, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. We present a roadmap for success in collaborative epidemiologic research, with recommendations focused on the following areas to maximize efficiency and success in collaborative research agreements: 1) operational and administrative considerations; 2) data access and sharing of sensitive data; 3) aligning network research aims; 4) harmonization of methods and measures; and 5) dissemination of findings. Future collaborations can be informed by our experiences and ultimately dedicate more resources to achieving scientific aims and efficiently disseminating scientific work products.

Indexed as

Collaborative researchepidemiologyharmonizationresearch design and methodsteam science

Identifiers

PMID39830608
PMCPMC11736290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.