Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830607›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Consortium-driven rapid software validation for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).

Theresa A Baker, Teresa Bosler, Adam L C De Fouw, Michelle Jones, Paul A Harris, Alex C Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Challenges to Change: Overcoming Hurdles to Clinician Driven Research.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Supporting rapid innovation in research data capture and management: the REDCap external module framework.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theresa A BakerVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2068-5989
Teresa BoslerVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Adam L C De FouwDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Michelle JonesVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1548-6740
Paul A HarrisVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-2011
Alex C ChengVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1787-691X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing trend for studies run by academic and nonprofit organizations to have regulatory submission requirements. As a result, there is greater reliance on REDCap, an electronic data capture (EDC) widely used by researchers in these organizations. This paper discusses the development and implementation of the Rapid Validation Process (RVP) developed by the REDCap Consortium, aimed at enhancing regulatory compliance and operational efficiency in response to the dynamic demands of modern clinical research. The RVP introduces a structured validation approach that categorizes REDCap functionalities, develops targeted validation tests, and applies structured and standardized testing syntax. This approach ensures that REDCap can meet regulatory standards while maintaining flexibility to adapt to new challenges. Results from the application of the RVP on recent successive REDCap software version releases illustrate significant improvements in testing efficiency and process optimization, demonstrating the project's success in setting new benchmarks for EDC system validation. The project's community-driven responsibility model fosters collaboration and knowledge sharing and enhances the overall resilience and adaptability of REDCap. As REDCap continues to evolve based on feedback from clinical trialists, the RVP ensures that REDCap remains a reliable and compliant tool, ready to meet regulatory and future operational challenges.

Indexed as

clinical researchElectronic data captureregulatory compliancesoftware validation

Identifiers

PMID39830607
PMCPMC11736291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.