ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare experiences and the cycle of genomic healthcare disparities: A cross-sectional study utilizing the 'All of Us' research program.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- What does it take to support community-engaged research in an academic medical center? A mixed-methods study of community and academic perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Insights from the development of an online toolkit to promote community-engaged substance use research in the Southwest Borderlands Region.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Institutional transformations for authentic community engaged and participatory research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Community-engaged health outreach program contributes to health service, research, and education in rural areas.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- 'There has to be some chemistry there': an interpretive description exploring the experiences, motivations and dynamics of partnered child health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Harnessing the Power of Community Engagement for Population Health.Preventing chronic disease · 2025Article
- Bridging the divide: barriers and facilitators to equitable community-academic partnerships in health research.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Engage for equity plus: Transforming academic health centers to sustain patient/community engaged research structures, policies, and practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Engaging stakeholders to strengthen support for community-engaged research at Stanford School of Medicine: An institutional assessment and action planning approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Adoption of E2PLUS tools and resources to promote the development of institutional capacity for patient-centered and community-engaged research at a cancer center.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community/patient group champion team retrospective look at engage for equity PLUS: Results from a post-intervention champion team focus group.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The continued momentum toward equity-based, patient/community-engaged research (P/CenR) is pushing health sciences to embrace principles of community-based participatory research. Much of this progress has hinged on individual patient/community-academic partnered research projects and partnerships with minimal institutional support from their academic health institutions. Methods: We partnered with three academic health institutions and used mixed methods (i.e., institution-wide survey ( Results: Five key themes emerged that were supported by quantitative data. First, the global pandemic and national events highlighting social injustices sparked a focus on health equity in academic institutions; however, (theme 2) such a focus did not always translate to support for P/CenR nor align with institutional reputation. Only 52% of academics and 79% of community partners believed that the institution is acting on the commitment to health equity (Χ Conclusions: Triangulating findings from this mixed-methods study revealed critical barriers which provide important targets for interventions to improving supportive policies and practices toward equity-based P/CenR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.