ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2024
Some Challenging Questions About Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants.
Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Cochlear implants (CIs) have improved the quality of life for many children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Despite the reported CI benefits of improved speech recognition, speech intelligibility, and spoken language processing, large individual differences in speech and language outcomes are still consistently reported in the literature. The enormous variability in CI outcomes has made it challenging to predict which children may be at high risk for limited benefits and how potential risk factors can be improved with interventions. In this article, we consider four challenging, unresolved issues that exist in the field of pediatric cochlear implantation (age at implantation, comorbid diagnoses, preimplant functioning in infants, and communication modality) to illustrate the value of adopting a broader integrated multidisciplinary approach to explaining variability and individual differences in outcomes. Conclusions: Four challenging and unresolved issues concerning our ability to predict individual differences before implantation were discussed. In order to address some of the current barriers to progress in dealing with these unresolved issues, a biopsychosocial system model is proposed as a possible unifying approach to conceptualizing these issues. Additionally, several new research directions to better understand and explain variability in pediatric CI outcomes are suggested.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.