ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Multi-Omics Analysis for Identifying Cell-Type-Specific Druggable Targets in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Analyzing disease-linked genetic variants via expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) is important for identifying potential disease-causing genes. Previous research prioritized genes by integrating Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) results with tissue-level eQTLs. Recent studies have explored brain cell type-specific eQTLs, but they lack a systematic analysis across various Alzheimer's disease (AD) GWAS datasets, nor did they compare effects between tissue and cell type levels or across different cell type-specific eQTL datasets. In this study, we integrated brain cell type-specific eQTL datasets with AD GWAS datasets to identify potential causal genes at the cell type level. Methods: To prioritize disease-causing genes, we used Summary Data-Based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) and Bayesian Colocalization (COLOC) to integrate AD GWAS summary statistics with cell-type-specific eQTLs. Combining data from five AD GWAS, three single-cell eQTL datasets, and one bulk tissue eQTL meta-analysis, we identified and confirmed both novel and known candidate causal genes. We investigated gene regulation through enhancer activity using H3K27ac and ATAC-seq data, performed protein-protein interaction and pathway enrichment analyses, and conducted a drug/compound enrichment analysis with the Drug Signatures Database (DSigDB) to support drug repurposing for AD. Results: We identified 27 candidate causal genes for AD using cell type-specific eQTL datasets, with the highest numbers in microglia, followed by excitatory neurons, astrocytes, inhibitory neurons, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). Conclusions: We systematically prioritized AD candidate causal genes based on cell type-specific molecular evidence. The integrative approach enhances our understanding of molecular mechanisms of AD-related genetic variants and facilitates the interpretation of AD GWAS results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.