Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830272›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Measurement and interpretation of the Harare HIV combination prevention cascade in priority populations: A population survey of adolescent girls and young women and young men in Zimbabwe.

Louisa Moorhouse, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton, Tawanda Dadirai, Rufurwokuda Maswera, Tafadzwa Museka, Phyllis Mandizvidza, Freedom Dzamatira, Blessing Tsenesa, Timothy B Hallett, Constance Nyamukapa and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louisa MoorhouseMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Jeffrey W Imai-EatonMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7728-728X
Tawanda DadiraiBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rufurwokuda MasweraBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tafadzwa MusekaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Phyllis MandizvidzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Freedom DzamatiraBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Blessing TsenesaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Timothy B HallettMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9681-0424
Constance NyamukapaMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Simon GregsonMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.

Funding

Multi-Level Behavioral Economics and Community Psychology Approaches to Strengthen HIV Prevention Cascades in Adolescent Girls and Young Women in East ZimbabweR01MH114562 · NIMH · IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE · PI GREGSON, SIMON ANTHONY JOHN, HALLETT, TIMOTHY · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
Gates Foundation INV-009999NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: HIV-negative adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and male partners, have disproportionately high HIV incidence in many African countries. We used a new HIV Prevention Cascade (HPC) approach to quantify levels of, and barriers to, prevention method use to guide interventions to increase effective uptake of primary HIV prevention. Methods: Data from the Manicaland HPC pilot study (2018-19; N=9803) in Zimbabwe were used to measure levels of sexual risk behaviour and construct HPCs for male condom, PrEP (females), VMMC (males) and combination prevention use by HIV-negative sexually-active AGYW (15-24-years) and male partners (15-29-years). Results: 19% of AGYW (N=1140) and 37% of young men (N=955) who had started sex reported one or more HIV risk behaviour and met the definition of the priority populations for HIV prevention. Of these, 63% of females and 87% of males were motivated to use an HIV prevention method, 28% and 63% had access to a method, and 16% and 53% used a method. Male condoms were the most commonly used prevention method, accounting for 97% of use in females and 55% in males. Barriers to motivation, access and capacity to use were reported for all priority populations and methods. Some barriers were common across HPCs (e.g. lack of risk perception, social unacceptability, and lack of acceptable provision); others were specific to particular prevention methods or priority populations (e.g. lack of availability). Conclusion: HIV risk behaviours were commonly reported, but use of prevention methods is low in young people in Manicaland. Population survey measurements of HPCs revealed large gaps in all steps in the cascade (lack of motivation, lack of access and lack of capacity to use prevention) but also provided information on the reasons for these gaps that can aid in designing interventions that reduce new infections.

Identifiers

PMID39830272
PMCPMC11741482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.